The Civil War And Its Ending Of Slavery :: Slavery Essays

The Civil War and Its death of SlaveryThis paper is about the civil war and about how it terminate bondage with theemancipation proclomation. I will also talk abou the natural loses of the war.The South, overwhelmingly agricultural, produced cash crops such ascotton,tobacco and sugarcane for export to the unification or to Europe, but it depended onthe North for manufactures and for the financial and commercial operateessential to trade. Slaves were the largest single investment in the South, andthe fear of slave unrest ensured the loyalty of nonslaveholders to the economicand social system.To maintain peace between the grey and Northern supporters in theDemocratic and Whig parties, political leaders tried to avert the slaveryquestion. But with growing opposition in the North to the backstage of slaveryinto the new territories, evasion of the unwrap became change magnitudely difficult.The Missouri via media of 1820 temporarily settled the issue by establishingthe 36 30 parallel as the line separating free and slave territory in theLouisiana Purchase. mesh resumed, however, when the United States boundarieswere extended westward to the Pacific. The Compromise Measures of 1850 providedfor the admission of California as a free state and the organization of two newterritories do and New Mexicofrom the balance of the land acquired in theMexican War. The principle of general sovereignty would be applied there,permitting the territorial legislatures to decide the status of slavery whenthey applied for statehood.Despite the Compromise of 1850, conflict persisted. The South had become aminority section, and its leaders viewed the actions of the U.S. Congress, overwhich they had lost control, with growing concern. The Northeast demanded forits industrial growth a protective tariff, federal subsidies for shipping andinternal improvements, and a sound banking and currency system. The Northwestlooked to Congress for free homesteads and federal charge for it s roads andwaterways. The South, however, regarded such measures as discriminatory,favoring Northern commercial interests, and it found the essay of antislaveryagitation in the North intolerable. Many free states, for example, passedpersonal conversance laws in an effort to frustrate enforcement of the FugitiveSlave Act .The increasing frequency with which "free soilers," politicians who arguedthat no more slave states should be admitted to the Union, won elective officein the North also worried Southerners. The issue of slavery expansion eruptedagain in 1854, when Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois pushed throughCongress a bill establishing two new territories -Kansas and Nebraska -andapplying to both the principle of touristed sovereignty. The Kansas-Nebraska Act,by voiding the Missouri Compromise, produced a wave of protest in the North,